Palestine Cry

The Truth of God and Our Lord Jesus Christ

Special Palestine Cry Blog articles: The Catholic Creed: The meaning of the Pasch of Christians.

JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONLY WAY AND TRUTH AND LIFE - NO ONE COMES TO THE FATHER EXCEPT BY HIM.

For as it was not possible that the man who had once for all been conquered, and who had been destroyed through disobedience, could reform himself, and obtain the prize of victory; and as it was also impossible that he could attain to salvation who had fallen under the power of sin,-the Son effected both these things, being the Word of God, descending from the Father, becoming incarnate, stooping low, even to death, and consummating the arranged plan of our salvation, upon whom [Paul], exhorting us unhesitatingly to believe, again says, "Who shall ascend into heaven? that is, to bring down Christ; or who shall descend into the deep? that is, to liberate Christ again from the dead." Then he continues, "If thou shall confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shall be saved." And he renders the reason why the Son of God did these things, saying, "For to this end Christ both lived, and died, and revived, that He might rule over the living and the dead." And again, writing to the Corinthians, he declares, "But we preach Christ Jesus crucified; "and adds, "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? " - St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III, Chapter XVIII, Section 2.

The Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ, Mary and John and the women at the foot of the Cross

Matthew 27:45 Now from the sixth hour, there was darkness over all the earth, until the ninth hour.

Origen tell us this darkness was only in Palestine, and the neighbouring countries: for as to the words, over the whole earth, or over the whole land, we find one kingdom or empire, by a common way of speaking, called the whole earth, or the whole world. As to the cause of the obscuration of the sun; and secondly, as to the extent of its darkness. Origen tells us that the darkness was partial, and confined to Judea and the neighbouring countries, as the darkness of Egypt was only perceived in that country, and not in Gessen, where the children of Israel were. Saint Jerome tells us that the obscurity was caused by the rays of the sun being suddenly withdrawn by divine power, as was the case in Egypt. The darkness in Egypt during the Passover of Moses was due to God's protection withdrawn from that land at that time. The darkness when Christ was Crucified for us is the judgement of God upon His Son Jesus Christ, in our place. For Jesus Christ knew NO sin. He never sinned, nor could He ever.

The meaning of the Pasch of Christians.

The Book of Wisdom, Chapter 17, describes the devils and demons thrown back upon the Egyptians when the Israelites under Moses were brought out of Egypt by God for God’s purposes (to prepare a place for the Crucifixion of Our Lord for the Redemption of the whole world of those who are saved). In the same way the same false gods and goddesses that the Egyptians served and which in so doing were the reason the Egyptians sacrificed their sons and daughters to the devils and demons behind the false gods/goddesses were the spirits that killed the Egyptian children that perished when the Israelites were brought out of Egypt. God does not murder children, period. The angel of death which destroyed in Egypt was one of the fallen spirits. God did not cause any of the fallen spirits to hurt anyone. God allowed the fallen spirits to do what it is their nature do to when He brought the Israelites out of the gates of hell which was Egypt. The children below the age of reason that died went to be with God for eternity, they will be resurrected with the just at the Second Coming of Christ. This principle of God allowing the innocent to be afflicted along with guilty finds its ultimate fulfillment in Christ’s singular and only salvific Kenosis. Jesus Christ committed no sin, not ever nor could He, and was and is and only could be utterly and absolutely and completely innocent of any and all wrongdoing and sin by His very nature as the Holy and True God. The guiltless sacrificed by His own will for the guilty. Even when the innocent are afflicted by the actions and evils instigated by the fallen spirits in the world, the innocent are not possessed by those fallen spirits. The principle of all being afflicted by the evil set loose upon the world for its unrepentant sin will occur when the universal plagues are let loose upon the world. See Apocalypse 16

The principle of our always, for our part, protecting children is given us by Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 18

1 At *that hour the disciples came to Jesus, saying: Who, thinkest thou, is the greater in the kingdom of heaven?

2 *And Jesus calling unto him a little child, set him in the midst of them,

3 And said: Amen I say unto you, *unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the greater in the kingdom of heaven.

5 And he that shall receive one such little child in my name, receiveth me.

10 Take heed that you despise not one of these little ones: for I say to you, *that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.

The principle of our ONLY worshipping the True God, the Father and the Son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit is given first in the historical truth of the Garden of Eden when Christ, who is the Tree of Life commands the first man and his wife, Adam and Eve to not have anything to do with the tree of the knowledge of good and evil which is Satan, the first fallen angel, nor with any of the fallen angels with Satan. Assisi of Babylon/Vatican/Rome is absolute and complete violation of that principle and is the Great Apostasy in full blown Satanic evil. Have nothing to do with the Vatican or suffer its eternal damnation in hell with it. The devil and demon worshipping pagans and the perfidious deicidal Jews are not ever any part of the Salvific action of Christ upon Golgotha/Calvary. Individual pagans and Jews if they repent of their not confessing Jesus Christ as the Immortal Son of God become flesh for our sake and sacrificed for our salvation and who confess publicly their sin of devil and demon worshipping and perfidy and deicide and who beg the Lord of all, the Lord God, the Father and the Son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit for forgiveness of their horrid and abominable sins, can and will be forgiven if they do so now in this life and will enter into the only path of salvation there is as dictated by God Himself. The Church, all the faithful – there is no other meaning acceptable to God for the word Church, is commanded by God to not have anything to do with the Apostasy.

Book of Wisdom, Chapter 17

1 For thy judgments, O Lord, are great, and thy words cannot be expressed: therefore undisciplined souls have erred.

2 For while the wicked thought to be able to have dominion over the holy nation, they themselves being fettered with the bonds of darkness, and a long night, shut up in their houses, lay there exiled from the eternal providence.

3 And while they thought to lie hid in their obscure sins, they were scattered under a dark veil of forgetfulness, being horribly afraid and troubled with exceeding great astonishment.

4 For neither did the den that held them, keep them from fear: for noises coming down troubled them, and sad visions appearing to them, affrighted them.

5 And no power of fire could give them light, neither could the bright flames of the stars enlighten that horrible night.

6 But there appeared to them a sudden fire, very dreadful: and being struck with the fear of that face, which was not seen, they thought the things which they saw to be worse:

7 And the delusions of their magic art were put down, and their boasting of wisdom was reproachfully rebuked.

8 For they who promised to drive away fears and troubles from a sick soul, were sick themselves of a fear worthy to be laughed at.

9 For though no terrible thing disturbed them: yet being scared with the passing by of beasts, and hissing of serpents, they died for fear: and denying that they saw the air, which could by no means be avoided.

10 For whereas wickedness is fearful, it beareth witness of its condemnation: for a troubled conscience always forecasteth grievous things.

11 For fear is nothing else but a yielding up of the succours from thought.

12 And while there is less expectation from within, the greater doth it count the ignorance of that cause which bringeth the torment.

13 But they that during that night, in which nothing could be done, and which came upon them from the lowest and deepest hell, slept the same sleep.

14 Were sometimes molested with the fear of monsters, sometimes fainted away, their soul failing them: for a sudden and unlooked for fear was come upon them.

15 Moreover if any of them had fallen down, he was kept shut up in prison without irons.

16 For if any one were a husbandman, or a shepherd, or a labourer in the field, and was suddenly overtaken, he endured a necessity from which he could not fly.

17 For they were all bound together with one chain of darkness. Whether it were a whistling wind, or the melodious voice of birds, among the spreading branches of trees, or a fall of water running down with violence,

18 Or the mighty noise of stones tumbling down, or the running that could not be seen of beasts playing together, or the roaring voice of wild beasts, or a rebounding echo from the highest mountains: these things made them to swoon for fear.

19 For the whole world was enlightened with a clear light, and none were hindered in their labours.

20 But over them only was spread a heavy night, an image of that darkness which was to come upon them. But they were to themselves more grievous than the darkness.

The Catholic Creed: The Final Trial: Traditional Catholic Prayers: Baptism

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

The Murder of an Arab Woman in EU

The Murder of an Arab Woman in EU

[Note: This article will be published in the magazine of the International Network of Journalists which is financed by the EU through the IEMED in Barcelona].

There are many people who abuse the family laws in Austria. Young men from Arab countries come to Europe in a gold-rush mood, and many of them go to brothels looking for a “wife”, a woman who will engage with them, in a sham marriage in order to receive a European nationality. Others marry women who could be their mothers or grandmothers. After they receive the nationality, these young Arab men divorce their Austrian “wives”, and soon marry a woman from their country of origin, whom they bring into the country using the family laws, which allow for family “reunification”. In Austria, the authorities deem as suspicious almost any marriage between an Austrian national and a foreigner since years, what hints at the extent of the abuse of the hospitality of this country being perpetrated by these “gold diggers”.

This is a tragedy if we take into account that the majority of the youths who come here looking for a European nationality do not respecting the European society, and could not care less about the values and customs of the European people, and they have no sense of belonging into the European community and its culture. They live in Europe, but in ghettos which are copies of their origin countries. In these origin countries and societies, discrimination and violence against females are a fix part of the structure and customs.

These people do not only damage themselves and their direct victims with their irresponsible actions and their lack of interest in their host countries, but they abuse the welcome which foreigners have been granted in these countries, and they also dirty the image of the communities of Arabs and Muslims in these countries who have decided to integrate. They offend the reputation of the many Arabs by way of education have reached high levels in the Austrian society. They are in the parliament, in medicine, engineering, technology, religion, politics, arts, universities, education, etc. Why should we defend these people who offend our reputation us as somebody commits an irresponsible action?

In Europe, specifically in Austria, violence and crimes against Arab women are not really of interest to the public opinion and the media, with exception of those cases when bloody tragedies transcend into public knowledge. It is seldom that the TV raises discussions about this issue, and the Austrian authorities, the Human Rights institutions, do not pay enough attention to this serious issue which threatens the structure of Austrian society. Because of this, the violence against Arab and foreign women remains largely unknown, and hidden, in Europe.

On last January 15 2010, an Egyptian woman was murdered in Vienna. The victim was 32 years old and the mother of a child of two years. According to the Austrian police, the killer was her husband. The victim had previously been subjected to physical violence by her husband; she had presented several complaints with the police in Vienna, and her husband had been banned from the flat.

During a previous attempt of an Islamic committee to effect a reconciliation of the couple, Mr. YY attempted to beat her before this committee, what caused Mrs. XX to tell her husband that “if I was married to a dog, he would treat me better than you”. According to my information, the problems between Mrs. XX and her husband were caused by him bringing girls to have sex in the couple’s bed, while she was present.

Mr. YY, the husband of Mrs. XX, was divorced from an Austrian woman, with whom he had two children, AA, a boy of age 12, and NN, a girl of age 16. NN was transferred to live in Egypt with his parents when she was 8, and she probably did not understand why her father left her in Egypt to live with the people who she did not know how communicate with. Why did Mr. YY not send his little boy AA to live with his sister in Egypt, or did the gender of the girl have anything to do with this decision?

  • Did the Father had sent his daughter to Egypt because she is a female, as I was told?
  • Does the father really believe that the Austrian society is not a good place for raising a female child, as I was told?
  • If this was the reason, then why did the father, Mr. YY, come to Austria, and why did he stay?
  • Why does he not renounce the Austrian nationality and return home to Egypt?

It is in my view a shame and utter disrespect towards all Austrians to live in this country, to receive the benefits from all of its many services, even to apply for and receive the citizenship, and then turn around and send the daughter away because this society is supposedly not appropriate for raising a girl.

It is difficult to imagine the psychological suffer of a girl raised in Austria, who is then sent to live in Egypt, where gender discrimination and violence against females are part of the structure and customs of family and society. Furthermore, in Egypt foreign females are often treated not better than slaves.

If the family of Mr. YY was such an ideal place for raising children, then why did he become a murderer instead of an engineer, or an idealist?

The further consequences of this tragedy are in themselves alarming. In the wake of the murder of Mrs. XX, her family has threatened to exact revenge and reprisals from the family of the murder. This spells danger for NN, the daughter of Mr. YY, as she is not only the daughter of the murderer, but a foreign female living with the family in Egypt.

In relation to this issue, I asked the spokesperson of the Viennese police if he could confirm that NN, who is presumed to be an Austrian national, is still alive and actually lives in Egypt, and if her security is guaranteed, taking in account the threat of revenge by the family of the victim. According to the police, the girl is alive and well, and that her mother is in constant contact with her. The police also stated that the Viennese youth authority (Jugendamt) has been noticed in regards to this issue. The statement of the police spokesperson follows below.

Sehr geehrte Frau Salam,

zu Ihren Anfragen kann ich Ihnen folgendes berichten:

Pressesprecher Abteilungsinspektor Roman Hahslinger. Pic. Credit: Bundespolizeidirektion Wien.

In der Strafsache YY, wegen Verdacht des Mordes, an seiner Ehegattin, kann ich Ihnen keine Auskünfte erteilen, da es sich um ein laufendes Verfahren bei der

Staatsanwaltschaft Wien handelt.

Ich habe aber mit der geschiedenen Frau des Beschuldigten, (SS), persönlich gesprochen. Diese teilte mir glaubwürdig mit, dass die bereits 16-jährige (NN) seit etwa 8 Jahren in Ägypten bei der Mutter ihres geschiedenen Mannes ständig aufhältig ist. (SS) telefoniert jeden Tag mit ihrer Tochter, zuletzt heute, und sie ist wohlauf.

Im übrigen ist das Amt für Jugend und Familie der Stadt Wien in dieser Sache eingeschaltet.

Ich hoffe, Ihnen damit ausreichend Auskunft erteilt zu haben und verbleibe

herzlichst

Roman Hahslinger

Pressestelle Polizei Wien

Are the views of this “journalist” compatible with Austria?

As disgusting as the murder of Mrs. XX and the surrounding circumstances are, the reaction of certain self-professed Egyptian journalists in Vienna is shocking to say the least.

Mr. YY is described as “a gentleman, generous, shy and striving for the general good, able to keep a space of respect and affection between him and ex-wife which guaranteed that both of them could take care of their children”.

  • How can a person with a history of family violence, of beating his wife, who was barred from the conjugal flat, who brought women home to do things repugnant to his wife, be described as being good with others?
  • Is this schizophrenia?
  • What would happen if a woman brings strange men to her husband’s bed? Would he stay quite while looking at his wife and such a “guest” in bed? What would happen if a married woman kept a space for (affection) with her ex-husband? Would the current husband congratulate such a behavior of his wife?

This journalist also blamed the victim, Mrs. XX by actually saying “I do not know if the wife XX has adopted the golden protocol (meaning the Austrian law) to get rid of her husband. The important thing was that the wife quarreled with her husband and contacted the Police, who decided (routinely) to keep the husband out of house for 10 days”.

This misogynist “journalist” did of course not mention that the victim had been subject to several physical assaults at the hands of her husband before she called the police to protect her. Neither did he mention the repugnant behavior of the husband, Mr. YY, or the fact that, as I was told, he had married this woman and brought her from Egypt in order to use her as a servant.

Another passage in the disgusting “report” of this self-anointed “journalist”: “The husband returned on Friday afternoon, 15 January 2010, to communicate and admonish his wife, but Mrs. XX screamed instead. The husband tried to make her silence, and she kept silence. After that he took his daughter and went to his ex-wife driving his red Mercedes … The ex-wife took the keys from Mr. YY and went to see the Mrs. XX. She found her dead, and she called the police. We wish Mr. YY that God stay with him in his distress, we ask God for his forgiveness, compassion and consolation”.

The report contained the picture of a smiling young man, as if he was looking for a bride. Obviously, there is no sense of shame over the murder of a wife among many Egyptians.

Questions to the Journalist

  • My question to this “journalist”: If Mr. YY did not intend to kill his wife, if he did not know that his wife was dead, then why suffocate her by closing her nose and mouth, as the autopsy revealed?
  • Why he did not call the ambulance when she fell to the floor?
  • Why did he take his small daughter and go to his ex-wife?
  • Why did he give the keys of his apartment to the ex-wife, with instructions to see if Mrs. XX was OK?

According to the suspicion communicated to me by my sources, Mr. YY gave his ex-wife the keys to his apartment, where he had left his wife dead, because he calculated that the ex-wife would leave fingerprints on the body of the victim when touching her or trying to wake her up, thus incriminating herself. He sent her with bad will and intent.

I can only say that the perpetrator and this reporter betray a deep misogyny, and they obviously share a mentality which deems it OK to kill a wife and to attempt to incriminate an ex-wife instead of finding such conduct disgusting in the extreme. Having seen too many senseless crimes against women.

I can only hope that the killer gets what he deserves.


Possibly related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Insults against the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and Muslims عربي Deutsch Two days ago the Freedom Party (FPOE), a political party which is against foreigners, immigrants and refugees...
  2. Tears At One in the Morning It was 1AM of 14 December 2008 when I read the news that the Austrian President Dr. Heinz Fischer would...
  3. The Israeli Terrorist Occupation is a Crime A huge demonstration against the Israeli war crimes in Gaza took place today in Vienna. Over 15.000 men, women and...
  4. The Second Marriage of Hamas Prime Minister The Palestinian Prime Minister of Hamas in Gaza, the leading figure of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), Ismail Abed Al-Salam...
  5. Doctors Protest Discrimination in Europe Auf Deutsch Saturday, October 31 2009, the Arab doctors in Europe sent strong criticism to the Austrian government during the...

No comments:

Post a Comment